A new approach to breast reconstruction offers better results for more women. According to MUSC plastic surgeon Kevin O. Delaney, M.D., pre-pectoral breast reconstruction can benefit women who:
- Are seeking reconstruction for the first time
- Underwent reconstruction surgery years or decades ago but aren’t happy with the results or suffer side effects
If women aren’t satisfied with how their breasts look or feel after reconstruction—or have lingering pain from the procedure—this new technique may help them.
Pre-Pectoral Breast Reconstruction: What Is It?
MUSC Health provides a range of treatment options for women seeking breast reconstruction after a mastectomy. Whether a mastectomy was performed to treat or prevent breast cancer, Dr. Delaney works closely with MUSC Health’s Hollings Cancer Center team to guide women toward the best available options.
MUSC Health offers 2 main types of breast reconstruction today. Free-flap DIEP (deep inferior epigastric perforator) breast reconstruction relies on a patient’s own skin and fat tissue to rebuild breast tissue, whereas other procedures use breast implants.
As Dr. Delaney explains, pre-pectoral breast reconstruction is a new way of performing implant-based procedures, an approach MUSC Health has been offering for close to 2 years.
“We're one of the first centers in the region to perform this pre-pectoral, or subcutaneous, breast reconstruction,” says Dr. Delaney. “In this procedure, we place a breast implant just beneath the breast skin, which means we don't need to cut a patient’s pec muscles.”
Previously, surgeons would need to cut a patient’s pec (or pectoralis major) muscles in order to set the implant underneath these muscles. That’s how implant-based breast reconstruction has traditionally been performed for the past 20 to 30 years.
Breast Reconstruction Technique Offers Many Benefits
According to Dr. Delaney, the new pre-pectoral approach offers many pros and few cons. Two significant benefits to patients: a better cosmetic outcome and less pain.
“One main benefit to this approach is that the cosmetic outcome of the reconstructed breast looks a lot better,” Dr. Delaney explains. “Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction avoids what is commonly known as an animation deformity, which happens to most women who’ve had implant reconstruction under the muscle, to varying degrees.”
This animation deformity occurs when a woman moves her arms or flexes her muscles. The implant, as well as the overlying breast skin, flattens and moves towards the armpit, which many women consider undesirable, says Dr. Delaney.
Because the pre-pectoral technique eliminates the need for cutting the pec muscle, women experience significantly less pain in the short and long term. This equates to a much faster and easier recovery following the surgery. Women also don't lose any functionality of their pec muscle, which is a possibility with the traditional approach.
Dr. Delaney says this new technique is now the preferred route of implant-based breast reconstruction at MUSC. He says it’s slowly catching on nationwide but that as of now, it’s largely offered only through academic centers.
Pre-Pectoral Breast Reconstruction: The Right Candidates
Dr. Delaney assesses the best reconstruction approach on a case-by-case basis, but he says there are only a few reasons why he would recommend against the pre-pectoral approach for implant-based reconstruction.
The main caveat is if a woman has previously undergone radiation therapy to the breast. “Since the breast skin typically doesn't heal as well after it's been exposed to radiation, it makes the pre-pectoral breast reconstruction more risky from a healing and ultimately infection standpoint,” says Dr. Delaney.
However, the majority of women seeking breast reconstruction can benefit from this approach. In addition to offering current patients a better treatment option, this procedure could also benefit a wide swath of women who received breast reconstruction previously but aren’t happy with the results.
“Many women who have undergone sub-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in the past, whether it was 3 years ago or 20 years ago, have significant complaints,” says Dr. Delaney. “Patients come to us with tightness in their chest or up into their arm, chronic pain in that area, as well as complaints about the animation deformity and how they don't like the look of their reconstructed breasts. Those are all real complaints that we hear every day.”
Previously, Dr. Delaney says he couldn’t offer those patients many solutions. But now, with this pre-pectoral technique, he says he can significantly improve many patients’ symptoms or complaints in a straightforward outpatient surgery that takes just a few hours.
“We can remove their old implant, put their muscle back down to where it belongs anatomically, and then put a newer, better implant in below the skin,” he says. “Their pain significantly improves. Their animation deformity goes away. And they're incredibly pleased with how much better their reconstructed breasts look and feel as opposed to when they were below the muscle.”
A Better Breast Reconstruction Option Now Available
Dr. Delaney wants to spread the message that there’s a new option available for women who may fall into this category—and that their health insurance would likely cover it because it’s a part of breast reconstruction care.
“As plastic surgeons, if patients have had breast cancer treated but they're displeased with their reconstruction, we want to help,” he says. “If they’re not local, we can often talk to patients via telehealth and let them know whether this procedure might benefit them.”
For more information, contact Dr. Delaney at email@example.com.